Law Society of Ontario (LSO) Paralegal Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Law Society of Ontario Paralegal Exam. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ensure you're ready for a successful exam experience!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


In which scenario might a Law Society hearing panel restrict a paralegal's practice?

  1. Due to a client's complaint only

  2. For a criminal act committed by the paralegal

  3. Based solely on the paralegal's years of experience

  4. When the paralegal is late for hearings

The correct answer is: For a criminal act committed by the paralegal

A Law Society hearing panel may restrict a paralegal's practice for a criminal act committed by the paralegal because such behavior raises significant concerns about their professionalism, integrity, and ability to effectively serve clients. Criminal conduct can compromise public trust and confidence in the legal profession, so the panel must ensure that paralegals adhere to high ethical standards. When a paralegal engages in criminal activity, it often indicates a lack of judgment or adherence to the legal framework that governs their conduct. As a result, the panel may impose restrictions or conditions on the paralegal's ability to practice in order to protect the public and uphold the reputation of the legal profession. The other scenarios presented do not typically warrant a practice restriction to the same degree. For instance, a client's complaint may initiate an investigation, but it does not automatically lead to restrictions unless it is substantiated and indicates serious misconduct. Years of experience do not inherently affect a paralegal's competency or ethical standing and therefore would not lead to restrictions. Being late for hearings, while unprofessional, is generally not considered a serious enough infraction to justify limiting a paralegal's practice. Thus, the most serious and justifiable scenario for restricting practice is indeed the commission of