Law Society of Ontario (LSO) Paralegal Practice Exam

Disable ads (and more) with a membership for a one time $2.99 payment

Prepare for the Law Society of Ontario Paralegal Exam. Access flashcards and multiple choice questions, each with hints and explanations. Ensure you're ready for a successful exam experience!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


What is the significance of keeping certain information from the jury during a voir dire?

  1. It ensures a quicker trial process

  2. It protects the integrity of the jury's decision-making

  3. It increases juror understanding of the case

  4. It allows the judge to make decisions without public scrutiny

The correct answer is: It protects the integrity of the jury's decision-making

Keeping certain information from the jury during a voir dire is significant as it protects the integrity of the jury's decision-making. This part of the trial process is designed to determine the admissibility of evidence and whether potential jurors possess any biases or preconceived notions that could affect their judgment. If jurors are exposed to information that is not relevant or admissible in the trial, it could improperly influence their views and decisions. By restricting access to specific information, the court can ensure that jurors base their decisions solely on the evidence presented during the trial and not on extraneous factors. This helps to uphold the fairness of the legal process and the impartiality required of jurors. When jurors maintain a clear focus on the appropriate evidential basis, it enhances the overall integrity of the judicial system and ensures that justice is served according to the law. The other options do not adequately address the primary purpose of such restrictions during a voir dire. While a quicker trial process might be a potential benefit, it is not the main aim of keeping information from the jury. Increasing juror understanding of the case could even backfire if jurors become confused by irrelevant details, and public scrutiny of a judge's decisions is typically managed through transparency and accountability within the legal framework